Quantcast
Channel: Airports
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 607

Here Are The World's Ugliest Airports

$
0
0

DNUWe know, we know: about 90 percent of the world’s airports—from jam-packed hubs like Frankfurt to dusty outposts like Muscat, Oman—could easily compete for the title of world’s ugliest.

After all, while each beautiful airport is beautiful in its own way, the ugly ones blend together in a fog of beige paint and low-hanging acoustic-tile ceilings.

The World's Ugliest Airports >

Some airports, however, stand out as particularly egregious. And in the course of narrowing our list—with help from an unscientific survey of design-savvy frequent fliers—a few things became clear. First, the worst offenders are ugly by choice rather than necessity: certain airports, like those in Bali and Sofia, Bulgaria, seem to have gone out of their way to acquire the uncanny placelessness that typifies the modern airport.

Second, pretty much everyone loathes the airport they use the most. For New Yorkers, that’s JFK. “I am sure there are worse airports, but New York should have one of the best,” argues Paola Antonelli, design curator for the Museum of Modern Art. For Angelenos, it’s LAX: “spread out, incoherent, and mean,” complains Silver Lake–based photo rep Maren Levinson. Frederico Duarte, a tastemaker from Lisbon, decries the faux granite and giant Martini & Rossi ads of his hometown airport, while architect Johanna Grawunder, who regularly commutes between San Francisco and Milan, issued a cri de coeur about Milan’s Linate.

This local loathing makes sense. Not only do travelers hate returning time and again to such chronic dysfunctionality and overwhelming dinginess, they’re also embarrassed that this is how others first encounter their beloved cities.

Third, the American airports we love to hate all share roughly the same problem: they were built in the 1950s or ‘60s and have been endlessly expanded and renovated to keep up with ever-increasing passenger loads. As futurist Paul Saffo says of LAX: “The original elegance has been destroyed by one ill-conceived remodel hack job after another. What once was a beautiful airport has become a broken architectural horror.” Ditto JFK, O’Hare, and so on.

It seemed wrong to include airports in active or recent war zones, so we left out Baghdad and cut some slack for the homely little terminal in Pristina, Kosovo. And while it would be easy to lash out at Third World airports, it felt unfair to do so. Besides, for some travelers, the ugliness of underdeveloped airports is a reassuring mark of authenticity.

London-based photographer Richard Baker—who spent months shooting Heathrow’s new Terminal 5—actually prefers airports designed “on a shoestring,” such as Khartoum or Kathmandu. “Western airports,” he insists, “are the ones that get it wrong.”

Related:

 

John F. Kennedy International Airport, New York City

When JFK was young—back when it was still called Idlewild—it was beautiful, a stunning assemblage of the best modern architecture of its time. The International Arrivals Building featured a graceful arched hall decorated with an Alexander Calder mobile, and Eero Saarinen’s TWA terminal was a bit of heaven. That was 50 years ago. Today JFK is resolutely hellish; arriving passengers are often greeted with endless blank corridors and stairways. “More than dysfunctional, it’s completely bananas,” says Museum of Modern Art design curator Paola Antonelli. Especially loathed are the Delta terminals, which industrial designer David Gresham calls “filthy, dilapidated, and unclear in any sense of signage or direction.”

The Upside: The new JetBlue terminal is perfectly functional. And Terminal 1—built in the 1990s and used by a number of international carriers—is not so bad.



Charles de Gaulle, Paris

The long, arched, column-free concrete expanse of De Gaulle’s terminal 2E (designed, like the rest of the airport, by architect Paul Andreu) was once hailed as a graceful addition—until a section of it collapsed in 2004 and killed four people. Even apart from that disaster, travelers have come to view CDG the way Monsieur Hulot might: as a symbol of a fiendishly technocratic world where nothing works and nobody cares. “I’ve suffered more abuse and bad signage at De Gaulle than at any other airport,” notes globe-trotting science-fiction writer and design critic Bruce Sterling. Somehow, all the meanness once associated with modern architecture has gotten stuck inside De Gaulle, like the victim of some cruel 40-year flight delay. British design guru John Thackara, who lives in the south of France, believes the airport “has rendered everyone who works there sociopathic. Its staff are literally unable to empathize with the appalling experiences they inflict on passengers.”

The Upside: Rabbits seem to enjoy the airport’s grassy environs.

 


Sheremetyevo International Airport, Moscow

Sheremetyevo’s Terminal 2 was completed in time for the 1980 Summer Olympics, which inspired more bad architecture than any other event in history. Moscow-born, New York–based architect and designer Constantin Boym observes, “Sheremetyevo was built in the ‘70s in the ‘heroic’ international style, and on a hexagonal grid. It’s a nightmare to navigate because all the walls and passages are at 60-degree angles to one another. It was renovated a couple of years ago, when a dusty ceiling grid was replaced with a smoother one, but this cosmetic repair only underscored the ugliness of the place.”

The Upside: The new terminal D opened in November—though Aeroflot has reportedly postponed transferring its flights there because of “an apparent lack of preparation and personnel.”

 


See the rest of the story at Business Insider

Please follow Getting There on Twitter and Facebook.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 607

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>